Red Melons
2008-12-08 16:59:55 UTC
Any NRP's who think their liability to the CSA ends if their child stops
full-time education may be surprised by a letter I had from the CSA
recently:
"A child's attendance record at college/school does not determine
whether or not he/she is considered to be a child."
This despite the legislation stating that "A child is defined as a person:
* under 16;
*16-18 years old and receiving full-time, non-advanced education
or
* 16/17 years old and registered for work or youth training"
So, in the CSA's opinion, if they can get a child to register for a
college course and then drop out, they can still sting the NRP for
payments for next year or two!
full-time education may be surprised by a letter I had from the CSA
recently:
"A child's attendance record at college/school does not determine
whether or not he/she is considered to be a child."
This despite the legislation stating that "A child is defined as a person:
* under 16;
*16-18 years old and receiving full-time, non-advanced education
or
* 16/17 years old and registered for work or youth training"
So, in the CSA's opinion, if they can get a child to register for a
college course and then drop out, they can still sting the NRP for
payments for next year or two!